You built the thing. You wrote the sales page. And the reply you keep getting, out loud or in silence, is "cool, but what is it, exactly?" That confusion is not a copy problem. It's a positioning problem, and April Dunford's Obviously Awesome is the sharpest book ever written on fixing it. This is Obviously Awesome positioning, applied: her core claim is that your product isn't inherently confusing, it's just placed in the wrong context, and context is a decision you get to make on purpose.
For a solo founder that's the whole game. You don't have a brand big enough to bulldoze through vague messaging. You get one shot to make a stranger instantly grasp why your thing is the obvious choice for someone like them. Dunford wrote her process for a team locked in a room for a week. You have an afternoon and an AI. This piece turns her ten steps into a prompt sequence you can run today.
Positioning is the context you deliberately place your product in, so the right customer instantly understands what it is, who it's for, and why it's obviously the best option for them. It's the answer to "what is this and why should I care," decided by you instead of left to the customer's guess.
Dunford's sharpest metaphor: positioning is like the opening scene of a movie. The first few seconds tell you whether you're watching a comedy, a thriller, or a documentary, and that frame shapes how you read everything after. A bottle of water is unremarkable in a grocery aisle and premium at a fancy restaurant. Nothing about the water changed. The context did.
Most founders think positioning is a tagline. It isn't. It's the strategy a tagline later expresses. Get the strategy wrong and no clever copy saves you. Get it right and the copy almost writes itself, because you finally know exactly who you're talking to and what makes you the obvious pick.
Because you're too close to it, and because you default to the market frame you first imagined instead of the one that actually flatters you.
Dunford's key insight: companies get stuck on the positioning they had at the very beginning, when the product did less. You built the thing to do X, so you describe it as an X tool, even after it quietly grew into something customers value for a different reason. Meanwhile a competitor with a worse product but a sharper frame eats your lunch, because they picked a context where their strengths sit dead center.
She's also blunt about why the old-school positioning statement fails you. You know the template: "For [target] who [need], our [product] is a [category] that [benefit], unlike [competitor]." You fill those blanks with your own assumptions, not market truths, and the result is forgettable and tells you nothing to do on Monday. Dunford throws it out and replaces it with a build-from-components process. That process is what we're automating.
Everything in Obviously Awesome stacks on five (plus one) building blocks. Learn these and the ten steps become obvious, because the steps are just the order you discover them in.
Competitive alternatives. What your customer would do if you didn't exist. Not just rival products, but the status quo: a spreadsheet, a freelancer, doing nothing. It's what you actually get compared against.
Unique attributes. The capabilities you have that those alternatives lack. Not what you think is cool, but what's provably different against a customer's real fallback.
Value themes. The benefit those attributes deliver toward what the customer wants, clustered into one to four themes. Customers remember themes, not feature lists.
Best-fit customers (who cares a lot). The narrow slice of buyers whose situation makes your value urgent instead of nice-to-have. Not "everyone."
Market category. The frame of reference you put yourself in so customers know what to compare you to. Pick the one where your strengths are the headline, not a footnote. This is the highest-leverage decision in the book.
The plus-one is relevant trends: a wave your best-fit customer already cares about that you can ride to feel timely. Dunford's warning: layer it on carefully, never let the trend become the whole pitch.
Dunford's official process is ten steps built for a room full of people and days of debate. You are one person. Here's the operator's compression: her ten steps folded into six passes you can run back to back in an afternoon.
Pass 1 is you, alone, being honest for ten minutes. The prompt below runs passes 2 through 6, where an AI earns its keep as a skeptic.
Do Pass 1 by hand: open a note and dump everything you currently say about your product plus every assumption you're carrying. Then paste the block below into your AI of choice, fill the [BRACKETS], and let it walk you through Passes 2 to 6 one at a time.
You are a positioning strategist trained on April Dunford's "Obviously Awesome." Run me through a positioning sprint for a one-person business. Be a skeptic, not a cheerleader: push back when my answers are vague, generic, or self-flattering, and never let me say "everyone" is my customer. MY PRODUCT: [what it does, in one plain sentence] WHO USES IT NOW: [customers who love it + the ONE reason they say] MY CURRENT PITCH: [how I describe it today, verbatim] Run these five passes ONE AT A TIME. After each, show your output, ask your sharpest follow-up, and WAIT for my answer before moving on. PASS 2 - COMPETITIVE ALTERNATIVES What would my best customer use if my product vanished? Push past named rivals to the real status quo (a spreadsheet, a freelancer, doing nothing). List 3 to 5. PASS 3 - UNIQUE ATTRIBUTES + VALUE THEMES For each alternative, what can I do that it CANNOT, and what benefit does that unlock? Kill any attribute the alternatives share, then cluster the survivors into 1 to 4 value themes named in the customer's words. PASS 4 - WHO CARES A LOT Define the narrow slice of buyers whose situation makes that value URGENT. Give markers specific enough to spot one in a crowd. Reject any answer broader than a clearly bounded group. PASS 5 - MARKET CATEGORY + TREND Propose 2 or 3 categories I could position in. For each, say which attributes become the HEADLINE and which go invisible. Recommend the one where my strengths sit dead center. Then suggest ONE trend my who already cares about, with a warning about overusing it. PASS 6 - CAPTURE IT Assemble everything into: (a) a plain-language positioning statement (no jargon, no template feel) (b) one liftable line: "The best [X] for [specific who]" (c) three proof points that back the claim (d) one thing I should STOP saying because it fights this positioning. Start with Pass 2 now. Ask your first question.
The magic is in the "one at a time" and "be a skeptic" instructions. A model left to run all five passes at once hands you a tidy, generic answer that means nothing. Forcing it to interrogate you at each step surfaces the non-obvious frame, the one you couldn't see because you were standing inside it.
Imagine a solo founder, call her Dana, who built a Notion template that helps freelancers send project proposals. She's been pitching it as "a proposal template for freelancers." Sales are flat. Here's the sprint, illustratively.
Alternatives and attributes (passes 2 and 3). Freelancers don't reach for other templates. They use a blank Google Doc, a free generator, or most often nothing: they wing it in an email. Against that blank doc, Dana's template does something specific: it structures the proposal around a fixed-price scope with a "what's not included" section that cuts scope creep. The value theme isn't "saves time." It's "get paid what you quoted."
Who and category (passes 4 and 5). Who feels that pain? Not hobbyists. Established solo freelancers billing fixed-price projects who've been burned by a client demanding "just one more thing" for free. Framed as "a Notion template" Dana competes with thousands and her strength disappears. Framed as "a scope-protection system for freelancers" that strength becomes the headline. The second frame wins, with a careful nod to the rise of solo and fractional work.
Capture (pass 6). Old line: "a proposal template for freelancers." New line, illustratively: "The fastest way for fixed-price freelancers to send a proposal that kills scope creep before it starts." Same file, clearer context. She stops saying "template," which drags her back into a crowded frame. Nothing about her product changed, only the context did. That's the whole lesson of Obviously Awesome, run in an afternoon.
Positioning isn't a standalone exercise. It's the layer everything else sits on, and once you know your who and your value theme, the downstream work gets easier.
Your offer inherits it: the value theme you land on tells you which promise to make, which is why this pairs cleanly with building a grand slam offer around the outcome your best-fit buyer craves. Your copy inherits it too, because knowing the exact who and frame is what lets you write a landing page that converts instead of describing features into the void. And over time, sharp positioning compounds into defensibility, the argument for how to build a brand moat that compounds.
Obviously Awesome is close to essential, but a few things deserve a hedge before you treat the output as gospel.
Positioning is a hypothesis, not a proof. The sprint gives you a sharp, testable frame in an afternoon. It does not tell you the frame is correct. Only the market does that, when you put the new line in front of real buyers and watch whether reply rates and conversions move.
An AI can only reason from what you feed it. Dunford's process assumes you talk to customers who love your product and mine their real words. Feed the model your own assumptions instead and you get a structured version of your blind spots. Do a few real customer conversations first if you can.
And positioning is not one-and-done. Dunford is explicit that your position should evolve as your product, market, and competitors change. The frame that's obviously awesome this year goes stale as a new category forms or a trend fades. Re-run the sprint whenever your win rate slips, not just at launch.
Used inside those limits, it's the fastest path a solo founder has from "cool, but what is it" to "oh, this is obviously for me."
That your product isn't inherently confusing, it's just positioned in the wrong context, and context is a deliberate choice you control. Dunford argues positioning is like the opening scene of a movie: it sets the frame customers use to judge everything after. Put your product where your strengths sit at the center, and the right buyer instantly gets why it's the obvious choice.
Competitive alternatives (what customers would use if you didn't exist), unique attributes (what you have that those alternatives lack), value themes (the benefit those attributes deliver, clustered into one to four themes), best-fit customers (the narrow group who care intensely), and market category (the frame of reference you choose). The bonus sixth is relevant trends, layered on carefully so you feel timely without looking like a bandwagon-chaser.
Dunford designed it for a cross-functional team over roughly a week of workshops. A solo founder can compress it into one focused afternoon by folding the ten steps into six passes and using AI to play skeptic at each step. The part you shouldn't rush is gathering real customer language first, because the process is only as good as the market truth you feed it.
Because the fill-in-the-blank "for X who Y, our Z is a category that benefit" template captures your assumptions instead of market truths, is hard to remember, and tells you nothing to do. Dunford replaces it with a build-from-components process that produces a position you can test and act on, not a sentence that sits in a doc.
Yes, for the structuring and skeptic work, with a caveat. AI is excellent at forcing you past vague answers, clustering attributes into themes, and pressure-testing which category flatters your strengths. What it cannot do is invent customer truth you never gathered. Feed it real quotes from buyers who love your product and it sharpens your thinking fast. Feed it only your assumptions and it hands you a polished version of your blind spots.
Positioning is the highest-leverage afternoon a solo founder can spend, because it's the layer every offer, page, and ad inherits from. Run the sprint, land your "best [X] for [specific who]," then stress-test it against real buyers before you rewrite a single headline. If you want that frame torn apart and rebuilt sharper by other operators running the same playbook, bring your draft positioning statement into the Asset Academy community and see how people one step ahead of you found their obvious context. Pressure-test your positioning with us here.
Inside the Asset Academy community we build the copy, funnels, and offers together, with the prompts and the feedback. $96/mo, or save with annual.
Join the community →